Teen pregnancy is a sin, but the RH Bill is not a sin
The heated battle between the government and the church over a problem in the Philippines, the teen pregnancy. But the government is pushing for legislation to curb teen pregnancy, which is one of the reasons for the population growth in the Philippines and only creates poverty for many Filipinos. This is affecting the development of the Philippines.
But this RH Bill (Reproductive Health Law) that the government is pushing, to stop the spread of teen pregnancy in the Philippines, is being pushed by the majority, especially those who support that law. But despite this, the church is against that law, because it is allegedly against the teachings of the word of God. That is the belief of the priests in the Catholic church.
However, Filipinos do not know which of the two is the sin of Filipinos. Isn't the law that will prevent the increase in young women getting pregnant being blocked by defenders of the lives of babies born to young women? What is wrong with those who block that law and why?
The RH Bill is the only one that can help curb teen pregnancy in the Philippines, through reproductive health education, for all. However, opponents such as those in the church almost want to defend the controversial teen pregnancies in the Philippines, because of their line in the Bible that is being instilled in Filipinos, especially young Filipinos.
So which is the only sin of Filipinos, the RH Bill or teen pregnancy in the Philippines? One of the only sins of Filipinos is teen pregnancy. Why is that? Don't Filipinos know that the actions of young women in the Philippines are also imitating the ways of the world? If they don't know about that sin, they should know about it.
The RH Bill is not really a sin, it is just a suppression of teen pregnancy in the Philippines, so that the number of children born to young women does not increase and the poverty caused by starting a family at a young age is reduced. That is what the opponents do not know, so they want to multiply until the number of poor people increases.
We know that their belief in the lives of babies born to young women in the Philippines is should not in to the delusional Christianity. It is because their belief in the Bible is wrong that they think that young women will have more babies in the Philippines, God did not command them to do that to young women rather than married couples.
Yes, they may say they are pro-life, pro-family, it is not right to defend the rights of young women who get pregnant, because they are not able to support their families at such a young age. Churches should not use the Bible as a defense of teen pregnancies in the Philippines, that is a wrong belief among many Filipinos.
Teen pregnancy in the Philippines is really the sin of Filipinos and not the RH Bill that will curb teen pregnancies in the Philippines. The government is doing the right thing, because that is what it should be doing, rather than increasing the number of children born to young mothers. That is to prevent young women in the Philippines from getting involved in pregnancy.
There is nothing wrong with avoiding early pregnancy. God has not blessed young women who get pregnant early and start families at a young age. That is not the teaching of other religions that those who have more children should do that. We should not always depend on what biblical religions say.
Filipinos should think about this, just because the Philippines is a Christian country, we should not just let the population swell from young women getting pregnant early, and we should not always base our beliefs on the churches' misinterpretations of the Bible. We know that teen pregnancy is not taught in the Bible.
Because, we know that the church and those who oppose the RH Bill are wrong. That's why we know that the RH Bill is not a sin any more than teen pregnancy. Remember, the suppression of teen pregnancy is to help our country, to reduce the population growth in the Philippines. I hope Filipinos understand this, to stop early pregnancy among young Filipinos.
No comments:
Post a Comment